The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing
The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
a hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it's effortless for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has achieved to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's arrived at these stage. Read more
Case files can also be accessed from the public access terminals inside the clerk’s office from the court where the case was filed.
Note: Please fill any subject and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave field blank.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property together with tax on once-a-year rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
The ruling on the first court created case regulation that must be accompanied by other courts until or unless either new regulation is created, or simply a higher court rules differently.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
Pakistani legal citations typically incorporate the year, court, and case number. Familiarizing yourself with this format will help you speedily Find the cases you need. Quite a few free case law websites allow you to definitely search directly using citations.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been in the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally seem, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion may be deemed, however, we're obvious inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, matter to availability of vacancy matter on the approval with the competent authority.
Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (3), continues to be setting a precedent which allows for much less complicated access to the public to approach the superior courts as well as the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
10. Without touching the merits of your case with the issue of once-a-year increases while in the pensionary emoluments of the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, such once-a-year check here increase, if permissible inside the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to get made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) on the Pakistan Constitution offers authentic jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded for the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )